Skip to main content

Attorney General Decision Restores Ability of Immigration Judges to Terminate Removal

Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a recent decision that restored immigration judges’ authority to terminate removal proceedings in Matter of Coronado Acevedo. 


Matter of Coronado Acevedo
, 28 I&N Dec. 648 (A.G. 2022) overruled a prior decision by then Attorney General Jeff Sessions that held that immigration judges “have no inherent authority to terminate or dismiss removal proceedings.” Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 462 (A.G. 2018) Id. at 463. This prior decision adversely impacted many noncitizens, particularly those with applications for collateral relief pending before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, such as T and U visa applicants, DACA applicants, and Violence Against Women Act self-petitioners. In those decisions the AG relied on his own reasoning from Matter of Castro-Tum, 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018) (a decision he issued earlier this year that restricts IJs’ and Board of Immigration Appeals’  authority to control their own dockets), in order to arrive at his conclusion. 

Pending the outcome of the rulemaking process, Garland confirmed that termination of proceedings is appropriate in certain circumstances, including the following: when a noncitizen has obtained lawful permanent residence after being placed in removal proceedings; where the pendency of removal proceedings causes adverse immigration consequences for a noncitizen who must travel abroad to obtain a visa; or where termination is necessary for the noncitizen to be eligible to seek immigration relief before USCIS. Until such time as a final regulation is issued, immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals should be permitted to consider and, where appropriate, grant termination in these types of limited circumstances. 

The decision in Matter of Coronado Acevedo, 28 I&N Dec. 648 (A.G. 2022) restores the Immigration Judge's authority to terminate proceedings in cases where the respondent clearly has relief available and may even have an approved application from USCIS already and is simply waiting on a visa to become available or is stuck in USCIS' insanely long processing times.

Comments

POPULAR POSTS

Matter of DUARTE-GONZALEZ, 28 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2023)

  Matter of DUARTE-GONZALEZ , 28 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2023) Noncitizens who are inadmissible for a specified period of time pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(i), due to their previous unlawful presence and departure are not required to reside outside the United States during this period in order to subsequently overcome this ground of inadmissibility.  Link to decision. 

USCIS Posts, Checklist of Required Initial Evidence for Form I-485 (Green Card Application)

USCIS sent out an email linking to their new page with this checklist. The USCIS.gov website states: Please do not submit this checklist with your Form I-485. It is an optional tool to use as you prepare your form, but does not replace statutory, regulatory, and form instruction requirements. We recommend that you review these requirements before completing and submitting your form. Do not send original documents unless specifically requested in the form instructions or applicable regulations. You may view the form instructions at uscis.gov/i-485 . If you submit any documents (copies or original documents, if requested) in a foreign language, you must include a full English translation along with a certification from the translator verifying that the translation is complete and accurate, and that they are competent to translate from the foreign language to English. There are three different checklists depending on the basis for which the applicant is filing their I-485 appl...

Matter of GARCIA, 28 I&N Dec. 693 (BIA 2023)

  Matter of GARCIA , 28 I&N Dec. 693 (BIA 2023) For choice of law purposes, the controlling circuit law in Immigration Court proceedings is the law governing the geographic location of the Immigration Court where venue lies, namely where jurisdiction vests and proceedings commence upon the filing of a charging document, and will only change if an Immigration Judge subsequently grants a change of venue to another Immigration Court. Matter of R-C-R-, 28 I&N Dec. 74 (BIA 2020), clarified. Link to Decisions.